文章摘要
李志田,李龙华,江一平,王木兰,华石瑶,胡佳,何凌,许嵩.《功能性腹痛中医临床诊疗专家共识》临床一致性再评价研究[J].中医药信息,0,():
《功能性腹痛中医临床诊疗专家共识》临床一致性再评价研究
Clinical consistency Reevaluation of Expert Consensus on Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Functional Abdominal Pain
投稿时间:2021-08-30  录用日期:2021-09-16
DOI:
中文关键词: 功能性腹痛  一致性再评价  专家共识
英文关键词: Functional abdominal pain syndrome  Consiformity Reevaluation  Expert consensus
基金项目:江西省卫计委科技处项目(20195331);国家中医药管理局中医药标准化项目(SATCM-2015-BZ(123));江西省科技厅青年基金项目(20192BAB215054)
作者单位E-mail
李志田 江西中医药大学研究生院 1741946217@qq.com 
李龙华 江西中医药大学附属医院  
江一平 江西中医药大学附属医院  
王木兰 江西中医药大学  
华石瑶 江西中医药大学附属医院  
胡佳 江西中医药大学附属医院  
何凌 江西中医药大学附属医院  
许嵩* 江西中医药大学附属医院 xusongplx@126.com 
摘要点击次数: 395
全文下载次数: 83
中文摘要:
      目的 《功能性腹痛中医临床诊疗专家共识》临床一致性再评价研究,促进共识的推广应用及诊疗指南的制定。方法 选取有代表性的全国4省8市8家医疗机构作为共识临床一致性再评价对象,采用前瞻性及回顾性病例调查分析方法完成病例信息的采集,一致性测评表填写,诊断、治疗与预防调摄方面的一致性评价。结果 91位功能性腹痛患者中,同共识相比,中医疾病诊断、中医疾病诊断依据总体一致率均在95%以上,西医疾病诊断、西医疾病诊断依据、证候诊断、证候诊断依据总体一致率均在50%左右,治则、方药及其他治法,同共识总体一致率分别为48.4%、44.0%、26.4%,预防调摄总体一致率61.6%。结论 该共识在功能性腹痛中医疾病诊断中,临床一致性较高,基本符合临床实践。但在西医及证候诊断与治疗方面,因存在个人临床经验水平及各地区各医疗机构具体情况不同,临床一致性偏低。
英文摘要:
      Objective:The clinical consistency reevaluation study of the Expert consensus on Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Functional Abdominal Pain the promotion and application of the consensus and the formulation of diagnosis and treatment guidelines.Methods:Representative medical institutions in 8 cities in 4 provinces and China were selected as the consensus clinical consistency reevaluation objects. Forward and retrospective case investigation and analysis were used to collect case information, fill in the consistency evaluation form, and complete the consistency evaluation in diagnosis, treatment and prevention adjustment.Results:In 91 patients with functional abdominal pain, compared with the consensus, TCM disease diagnosis, TCM disease diagnosis rate is above 95%, TCM disease diagnosis, western medicine disease diagnosis, syndrome diagnosis is about 50%, treatment, prescription and other treatment, with the consensus of 48.4%, 44.0%, 26.4%, respectively, the overall consensus rate of 61.6%.Conclusion:This consensus has high clinical consistency in the diagnosis of functional abdominal pain, which is basically in line with clinical practice.However, in terms of western medicine and syndrome waiting diagnosis and treatment, the clinical consistency is low due to the different level of personal clinical experience and different medical institutions in each region. Keywords:Functional abdominal pain syndrome;Consiformity Reevaluation;Expert consensus
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
微信公众号
分享按钮